On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:48:54PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > Trying (log2 (expt 2 251)) in Racket, which prints 64-bit floats > accurately (unlike Chicken, which depends on C to do it)
That's a complete mischaracterisation. First, it depends on your definition of "accurately", and secondly, you can tell CHICKEN to change the print precision. See my other mail, which shows that Racket is _also_ truncating the value, just after more digits than CHICKEN is doing so. Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
