On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:11:04PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Should I just file bugs like that for each one of these other missing > components, and set them to block a tracker bug for things to include > on the ISO? In my view a baremetal installation is first a server, so > it should have basic server tools.
The hardware enablement and configuration stuff needs to be available, I agree. Unfortunately, after all of these years, hardware is still terrible.* But I'm not sure stuffing every possible tool into Atomic is the way to go. Options I can see are: A. Separate hardware/virt trees; have the installer ISO point at the hardware one by default (but also have the option of virt) B. Finishing Atomic overlay support; making hardware enablement an overlay C. Getting all this stuff to work properly in SPCs D. Something else? * so is software. *sigh* -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
