On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Miller
<mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:16:15PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > think QA clearly understands what cloud image(s) are release blocking,
>> > as previously they were just the non-atomic images.
>> Which images are prominent on the download pages and how much of a
>> relationship there is between that and 'release blocking' status is
>> *also* not my problem, but I'd agree with you (Chris) that it'd be
>> rather strange for the most prominently advertised deliverable for a
>> given product not to be a release-blocking one.
>
> I don't think that Atomic *needs* to be release blocking, because if it
> misses the grand unified release, we have the ability to update it at
> the next cycle, so it's less of a big deal. But if we collectively
> prefer to make sure everything is lined up on the release day... I can
> see arguments for that, too.
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
