[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17707325#comment-17707325
 ] 

Jordan West commented on CASSANDRA-18352:
-----------------------------------------

The newest run is much more green: 
[j8|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/jrwest/cassandra/158/workflows/c10f7c56-3821-4f27-98e1-0664b1e9c73f]
 [j11 
|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/jrwest/cassandra/158/workflows/cf28afe3-b9f7-4f63-8f07-3c35af8398e2]

> Add Option to Timebox write timestamps
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-18352
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: CQL/Semantics
>            Reporter: Jordan West
>            Assignee: Jordan West
>            Priority: Normal
>
> In several cases it is desirable to have client provided timestamps generated 
> at the application-level. This can be error prone, however. In particular, 
> applications can choose timestamps that may be nonsensical for a given 
> application. One dangerous manifestation of this is the "doomstone" (a 
> tombstone far in the future of any realistic write). This feature would allow 
> either operators or users to specify a minimum and maximum timebound of 
> "reasonable" timestamps. The default would be negative infinity, positive 
> infinity to maintain backwards compatibility. Writes that are USING TIMESTAMP 
> with a timestamp outside of the timebox will see an exception. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to