On Wednesday 13 May 2009 00:17:26 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:52:48AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:40:48 +0200 Pander <pan...@users.sourceforge.net> said: > > > Steve 'dillo Okay (Roadknight Mobility Labs) wrote: > > > > On May 11, 2009, at 13:26 , community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote: > > > >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez > > > >> <da...@tuxbrain.com > > > >> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big > > > >> guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any reference on that in > > > >> the web site. any clue any one? > > > > > > > > "OpenNoko" anyone ? :) > > > > > > LOL > > > > > > Why don't they adapt what is already out there... Otherwise it would be > > > OpenNono > > > > the simple version it seems is that they simply don't like fso's api. > > marcel holtmann said its too low-level and they don't see it as something > > they want. ask them for more details - but tat seems to be the gist of > > it. > > I'm a layman but that seems bonkers if that's their "official" argument... > they could always add a layer above it :(
Besides that a) it really isn't too low level -- it's rather an appropriate compromise between the 3GPP specs and what applications want to know -- and b) there's an even higher level already available in FSO called ophone. :M: _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community