> No, they really aren't. You can download
> and install stuff from outside the
> approved store on commercial android handsets

Hello, is it true that Google can uninstall an app not approved by themselves 
(that is, an app not included in the 'Android Market')? I understand the app 
would be uninstalled when the user visits a Google shop or accesses a Google 
service?

Regards,
Juan Lucas
 


________________________________

                De: community-boun...@lists.openmoko.org en nombre de Gothnet
                Enviado el: jue 21/05/2009 15:53
                Para: community@lists.openmoko.org
                Asunto: Re: [OT] Is Android really free? (was Re: root almighty)
                
                



                Ignacio Torres Masdeu wrote:
                >
                >
                >> in fact there is a lot of closed linux devices out there , 
for example
                >>  routers,motorola phones, ebook reader... and those doesn't 
mean Linux
                >> is closed,
                >
                > It only means that if they don't publish the code, and that's 
usual,
                > they are violating the GPL. http://gpl-violations.org/
                >
                >
                
                Not necessarily. They don't have to provide any mechanism to 
re-flash the
                device, then the linux based device is just as closed, even 
when they
                publish the source. GPL does not protect against this (v3 
might, not sure).
                
                
                Ignacio Torres Masdeu wrote:
                >
                >
                > The problem with Android is not the license of the OS, but the
                > "ecosystem" around it. Closed hardware, DRMd content 
(applications,
                > music), the restrictions imposed on the OS by cell 
companies... it's a
                > nightmare, and the freedom of the user doesn't even appear in 
the
                > horizon.
                >
                
                It's BSD style FOSS. Anyone can do what they like with it. The 
fact that
                others can close their versions doesn't detract from that. If 
you want to
                argue that it loses flexibility as a platfor, when you're using 
a self- or
                community-compiled version, then sure.
                
                
                Ignacio Torres Masdeu wrote:
                >
                > I have strong feelings against Android, for the restrictions 
around it
                > are very similar to those of the iPhone, though Apple doesn't 
try to
                > disguise themselves as "open source paladins".
                >
                
                No, they really aren't. You can download and install stuff from 
outside the
                approved store on commercial android handsets
                and on free/open ones ones (Android on FR) you have full 
control, including
                the full source under APL2.
                
                You just try getting the source from Apple and running it 
somewhere else.
                
                
                Ignacio Torres Masdeu wrote:
                >
                > Android, as a platform (not an OS, not a device) is worst 
than closed,
                > for it lures developers with the false concept of an open 
environment.
                >
                
                Yes, just like the entire BSD operating system! It's a trap!
                *facepalm*
                
                
                
                Ignacio Torres Masdeu wrote:
                >
                > Yes, people could fork and create gAndroid but where would 
they run
                > it? It's a wolf with a lamb skin,
                >
                
                Why fork when you can port? There are several places doing just 
that and
                re-submitting upstream when they have good results. It's being 
ported to
                some nokia devices, netbooks, FR etc.
                
                And why is it a wolf in lambs skin? I mean, what the hell are 
you talking
                about at this point? Where would they run what?
                
                
                Ignacio Torres Masdeu wrote:
                >
                > And my last rant. Why did they create yet another isolated 
platform?
                > For f*cks sake! It's not even standard java! At least 
Objective-C
                > builds on top of C! Couldn't they create a set of libraries? 
Or use if
                > they wanted portability use Python? Argh!
                >
                > My 2 cents
                >
                
                Java is the most popular language on the planet right now, more 
people know
                it than know pretty much anything else going. Attracting 
developers is
                essential to the success of the platform. Why *not* use java?
                
                I use python myself, and I like it, but I don't see why 
choosing java was
                wrong.
                
                
                Frankly, I think you're nuts. A big corp puts a lot of work in 
and releases
                a whole new userspace environment targeted at MIDs, phones etc, 
under one of
                the least restrictive licenses out there, and you're calling it 
worse than
                closed source!
                
                You're weird!
                
                You instinctively decide to hate it due to some features you 
don't like
                (which are aimed at supporting proprietary apps, and you're 
free to disable
                in your version, or just not use those apps). There's nothing 
stopping
                people from releasing android apps as FOSS. personally I really 
like the
                idea of paying for apps from an app store if I choose to, or 
using/writing
                free ones if I don't.
                --
                View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/-OT--Is-Android-really-free--%28was-Re%3A-root-almighty%29-tp2943035p2952092.html
                Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
                
                
                _______________________________________________
                Openmoko community mailing list
                community@lists.openmoko.org
                http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
                

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Reply via email to