on a sidenote: Was KDE no open source software when Qt wasn't FOSS (for those who still remember that time)?
In layout project files they might even be (C) non-free libraries for e.g. component footprints, which would *forbid* disclosing them to the general public. Is the hardware less open then? Should EE create their own footprint lib to be allowed to give the rest of the docs to the community, since without footprints in project file the whole project isn't open anymore? I think sometimes it's pretty tedious to discuss hw subjects with people who come from a sw background. So I will stop contributing to this futile discussion now. /j -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments (alas the above page got scrapped due to resignation(!!), so here some supplementary links:) http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml http://www.nonhtmlmail.org/campaign.html http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil_still.shtml http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii/ (German)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
