Are you 100% sure? The patch from kernel 2.4.18 to 2.4.19 has this: CFLAGS := $(CPPFLAGS) -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 \ - -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common + -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common +ifndef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER +CFLAGS += -fomit-frame-pointer +endif
--- Guido Draheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems the gcc3.2 ignores -fomit-frame-pointer, > without > giving any diagnostics about it. I had noticed it > with > some of my software *breaking* because of that as > some > assembler parts were trying to access %ebp then. > > This may affect the mdk9 *kernel* itself - usally > the > linux kernel should be compiled with > -fomit-frame-pointer, > and a quick dissassemble-check on some > modules/drivers > showed a standard stackframe now. Perhaps some other > option > enforced a standard stackframe but traditionally it > means > that the kernel is *slowed* down in this mode. > > Are no-omit-frame-pointer/use-standard-stackframe > intentional? It is atleast beyond my expections, so > I'm issuing it as a warning-flashlight - I haven't > found notice of it in general gcc docs, so is that > only a behaviour of the mdk gcc3? > > $ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.0 3.2-1mdk) > > -- cheers, guido (not subscribed to > cooker ML) > > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
