On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:08:23 GMT, Mandy Chung <mch...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Yes we do. The main reason being that the `jdk` image has more to it than > > just the image. `src.zip`, CDS data, `demo` and so on. We don't want to > > duplicate that. To us, including the `jmods` folder is something that comes > > into play when actually producing the bundles of the JDK. The linkable > > runtime option allows for a more flexible distribution of the resulting > > JDK. With or without packaged modules without limiting `jlink` usage (for > > the common use-cases). > > I'm not sure how keeping packaged modules is related to `src.zip`, CDS data, > `demo` and so on as they are the targets after `images/jdk` is built. What I mean to convey is that how the directory tree in `images/jdk` looks like shouldn't change based on the `--enable-linkable-runtime-image` configure flag. That is, there will be a `images/jdk/jmods` folder if not also `--disable-keep-packaged-modules` is given. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2004668722
