On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 01:49:01 GMT, Dean Long <dl...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Scott Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Oops > > I went ahead and tried a pure-Java implementation, and it is faster for small > sizes (up to 8) and only about 1.5x slower for larger sizes, so that might > make for an interesting fallback if there is no customized assembler > implementation available or if the size is known to me small. > > Ideally, I think we would want C2 to be more aware of setMemory stores, so > that it can remove redundant stores, like it does with InitializeNode. @dean-long in my old PR I have done the same, choosing a (not yet) configurable cutoff value. See https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16760 ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18555#issuecomment-2041314429
