On Tue, 7 May 2024 22:23:48 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> With the advent of JEP 467, `///` comments may be treated as documentation > comments, and may be subject to the recently new `javac` warning about > "dangling doc comments" in unexpected places. > > In keeping with the policy to keep the `java.base` module free of all `javac` > warnings, this patch proposes edits to existing uses of `///`. > > There are two dominant policies in the proposed changes. > 1. A long horizontal line of `/////` is replaced by `//-----` > 2. A long vertical series of lines beginning `///` is replaced by lines > beginning `//|`. > > As with all style changes, I have also tried to honor local usage, for > consistency. > > In one place, a pair of comments appeared to contain directives (`CLOVER:ON`, > `CLOVER:OFF`). I investigated the use of such comments to determine that the > exact form of the comment prefix was not significant. (Phew!) > > > (This PR is informally blocked by JEP 467). Will we incorporate the changes for JDK-8 target code as in #19151? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19130#issuecomment-2118330326
