On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:59:52AM -0600, Myles Watson wrote: > It looks like only 5632 has the "ADT7463 properly initialized" > message. One problem is that patch 2 was meant to be applied after > patch 1,
Ah, whoops, I was wondering if I was doing the right thing there... > so the device didn't end up in the tree for that run. I'll > have to think about why the only message from the new device with > patch 1 is "I2C: 00:d0 missing read_resources" For some reason it > doesn't look like it got the correct ops. > > I wonder why the temperature values look right in all cases. Does it > need to be cold booted in order for the initialization to be needed? All boots were cold. Thanks, Ward. -- Ward Vandewege <w...@fsf.org> Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot