Am Fr., 6. März 2020 um 12:15 Uhr schrieb Piotr Król <piotr.k...@3mdeb.com>:
> If the community keeps our reviews not merged, we > cannot use that as proof of our engagement and quality. [...] > This doesn't contribute to project health. > Indeed. Looking into Gerrit, we have >1000 commits open for coreboot. Some of our patches got no attention for over 1.5 years. > Most Gerrit views are sorted by last change date, so often it already helps to rebase to master to bring it in front of reviewers again. > What we are asking is a decision about those patches - if anything is > wrong we will fix that. > That's fair. As said, we have a rather big backlog, and to me that indicates that we should look into ways to reduce that, and keep things actionable (and with clear responsibility who's next: author, reviewer, ...) There's development going on with Gerrit that should assist that, and there are a few more ideas floating around in a different context that could also help here, but whatever we can improve in infrastructure, we still need to use it. We believe this is a little bit bigger problem that should be addressed > by coreboot leaders since it reflects the healthiness of the community > and agenda of participating entities. > I put the topic on the agenda for tomorrow's leadership meeting ( https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NRXqXcLBp5pFkHiJbrLdv3Spqh1Hu086HYkKrgKjeDQ/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NRXqXcLBp5pFkHiJbrLdv3Spqh1Hu086HYkKrgKjeDQ/edit#> ) Thanks, Patrick -- Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
_______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org