Do we have criteria on which to decide if quark is worth keeping? Is there a deadline for the work? At some point, you're going to find code changing out from under you; are you committing to be the maintainer?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 7:45 AM Angel Pons <th3fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 2:19 PM Andy Pont <andy.p...@sdcsystems.com> wrote: > > > > Ron wrote… > > > > >so how's it going? > > Slowly! The day job has got in the way a bit but I have been struggling > > to build the FSP binaries based on the instructions at [1]. I’m not > > sure whether that is down to me not fully understanding the instructions > > (always possible) or whether there is work-in-progress that needs to be > > completed. > > > > I managed to build the FSP 1.1 binary using the six year old version of > > edk2 that Lee also has on his GitHub using an Ubuntu 16.04 development > > machine. I haven’t yet managed to find a way to successful build the > > FSP 2.0 binary. Trying to build EDK2 BaseTools throws a pile of Python > > syntax errors which may or may not be critical. I’ve assumed they > > aren’t for now and am working on getting the binary to build. > > Instructions on how to build QuarkFsp were added here: > https://review.coreboot.org/29029 > > > -Andy. > > > > 1 - https://github.com/LeeLeahy/quarkfsp > > Best regards, > Angel _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
