Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> writes: >That's a mischaracterisation I think. Some folks (incl. me) have said that >1024 DHE is arguably better that no PFS and if current deployments mean we >can't ubiquitously do better, then we should recommend that as an option, >while at the same time recognising that 1024 is relatively short.
+1. Peter. _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
