-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
<A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/">The Home Page of J. Orlin Grabbe</A>
-----
Financial Markets in Japan

Japanese Government Bond Yields Headed to 5 Percent?

A steep yield curve would benefit the banks


Could 10-year Japanese government bond yields be heading towards 5 per
cent? Six months ago the idea would have seemed outrageous, given that
the country was breaking historical records with yields below 0.7 per
cent.


But as the state of the Japanese economy deteriorates and the government
threatens to flood the market with about ¥40,000bn of new bonds, the
thought of Japanese bond prices falling even lower and yields rising
higher is no longer inconceivable. Last week the yields on 10-year JGB
touched a recent high of 2.44 per cent and some analysts are predicting
even more dramatic upswings.


Takeshi Fujimaki, branch manager at J.P. Morgan, says: "I think bond
yields could go to 3 per cent in March and even 5 per cent by the end of
the year."


This view remains an extreme one: the consensus in the market is that
yields will probably remain under 3 per cent this year. But Mr
Fujimaki's forecast reflects broader anxiety.


According to a report by Barclays Capital, entitled "Japan: Apocalypse
Now", the rising level of debt and debt/GDP ratio, means Japan faces an
unstable debt situation which could have an adverse impact on the
country's credit rating.


Japan's ratio of government debt to gross domestic product has increased
from 61.4 per cent in 1990 to almost 100 per cent last year, and
according to Barclays' research Japan is fast approaching countries such
as Belgium and Italy, whose debt/GDP ratio peaked at 135 per cent.


Yet some economists argue the yields are unlikely to rise much further,
provided short-term interest rates remain unchanged. "The extent to
which yields could rise depends on how steep the yield curve will
become," says David Knott at Deutsche Bank. "Historically, another 50
basis points on 10-year bonds would bring the yield curve to a
historically steep level."


He argues that steepening of a yield curve can help banks to
recapitalise. This is because banks are able to borrow short-term money
at low interest rates and re-invest in longer-term securities at higher
rates.


"Typically, when a central bank wishes to inject profits into the
banking system, it steepens the yield curve," says Mr Knott. A steeper
curve was a factor helping US banks to boost profits in the early 1990s
- allowing them to recapitalise.


Kiichi Miyazawa, finance minister, appears very relaxed about bond
yields, sparking rumours that the government "secretly" wants to drive
yields higher to help banks. Such conspiracy theories probably give the
government too much planning credit: in practice, there is precious
little sense of policy co-ordination at the moment. And since Japanese
companies tend to rely more on short-term funding than their US
counterparts, a steeper yield curve would have less impact.


Hiroshi Toda, global head of debt markets at Nomura, blames the steeper
yield curve not on government policy but on a structural "mismatch"
between public institutions which want to increase long-term borrowing
and private investors, such as Japanese banks, that want to focus on
short-term investments. "I think that the market is in a transitional
period . . . We will see a steepening of the yield curve as investors
try to find the new equilibrium," he says.


Yet what has startled many observers is the speed of the JGB swings and
their apparent lack of relation to economic fundamentals. Consequently,
opinions on where the JGB market may be heading next are now based as
much on socio-political as on economic analysis.


As Masuhisa Kobayashi, analyst at Merrill Lynch, says: "Japan is now
backed into a corner, where textbook economics no longer makes sense."


What has dented investor confidence, however, is political uncertainty.
It is still unclear, for example, just what the real level of JGB supply
next year will be. The government claims that net new JGB issues will be
only ¥31,000bn. But this does not include additional spending measures,
or the large quantities of local government debt that some
municipalities are threatening to issue.


Nor, most importantly, does it include any bonds that might be issued to
fund the ¥60,000bn banking reform package. And suggestions by
politicians that Japan should raise funds to buy land or stocks have
further unnerved the markets.


It is also unclear how fast the government wishes to impose reform on
its traditional system of public finance. Public institutions such as
the Trust Fund Bureau have traditionally absorbed about half the JGB
market. If the government presses ahead with its apparent pledges to
change this system, it could deliver painful new blows to the market.


Meanwhile, even the government's short-term policy goals appear
contradictory. Some politicians have reacted to the recent surge in bond
yields with horror, and are calling on the Bank of Japan to start
purchasing bonds directly from the government, in effect "monetising"
its debt. Masaru Hayami, the bank governor, has dismissed these calls.
Yet many economists believe inflation could be the only way to
kick-start Japan's flagging economy.

The Financial Times, Feb. 8, 1999


Impeached POTUS

It's All Too Obvious Who Was Pulling Monica's String

by Mark Steyn

IT was a bit like a Bafta ceremony. The California megastar was
unfortunately unable to be with us in person, but she'd thoughtfully
pre-recorded a perfunctory greeting: "Yes. No. I don't recall." Monica
has grown up into Bill Clinton in drag, a deposition nightmare.
Unable to face seeing the intern on the floor of their beloved chamber,
the senators voted to allow only video testimony. Sadly, nothing came of
a bipartisan compromise proposal to have Republican prosecutors
cross-examine a blow-up Monica doll: pull the string and hear her three
standard responses at random - "Not really", "I guess", "I'm not real
comfortable with that". Alas for the House managers it was all too
obvious who was pulling Monica's string.

As Congressman Ed Bryant struggled to find the merest titbit, old Monica
hands took to wondering how Mr Clinton had kept her on side. He can't
signal her with his neckties as he used to: the independent counsel has
subpoenaed every single presidential accessory.

Some of us recalled that moment in the Starr report when Monica told Mr
Clinton that she had some ideas on education reform that she wanted to
discuss with him. "Later, baby, later," said the President, motioning
her toward the worn patch on the Oval Office shagpile.

But clearly for once she'd given him something to chew on. His State of
the Union education proposals were so crazy they can only have come from
Monica and, in his attempted Federal annexation of every school board in
the country, the President was signalling in his own touching way that
he still cared. Slobodan Milosevic should be grateful she never got to
outline her proposals for air strikes on Belgrade.

On the other hand, it may be that Monica just has more style than Slick
("Hey, she's a stalker") Willie: she knows a mistress doesn't trash her
lover. So, invited to respond to Clintonian hair-splitting, she simply
sliced the follicle into quarters.

Take, for example, the famous Paula Jones deposition definition about
touching the enumerated body parts with "intent to arouse": in her grand
jury testimony, she said he'd touched 'em; in his testimony, he stood by
his earlier denials. Now she insists there's no contradiction: he
touched the enumerated body parts, but who's she to say whether he
intended to arouse? Indeed, knowing the President's narcissism, it seems
highly unlikely.

Thrown by Monica's coolness, Congressman Bryant had the haunted look of
a man who knows, if he's not careful, he'll wind up arguing that for the
President to touch enumerated body parts with no intent to arouse
clearly rises to the level of an impeachable offence.

The Clinton defence team has taken no chances in this trial. Last week
96-year-old Republican Senator Strom Thurmond once again dipped into his
pockets and produced two oranges, which he pressed upon the President's
lady lawyers, Nicole Seligman and Cheryl Mills.

Faced with most southern white Republican men, Ms Seligman and Ms Mills
instinctively frost up. But with ol' Strom they flirt, they giggle, they
flutter their eyelids.

And this weekend it paid off big time: when it came to the motion on
whether to hear Monica in person on the Senate floor, Senator Thurmond
drew himself up and boomed: "No!!!" The President's flirty attorneys had
accomplished the impossible: for the first time in eight decades, ol'
Strom had turned down the opportunity to see a 25-year-old woman in the
flesh.

In other late-breaking fruit news, I want to correct Thursday's
misleading characterisation of Vernon Jordan's breakfast with Monica
Lewinsky: it was not only wrong; it was, as the President would say,
inappropriate. An unreliable source leaked to me that Ms Lewinsky
ordered the fruit plate at the Park Hyatt. I now have a photocopy of Mr
Jordan's credit card receipt before me and, in fact, she had the
open-faced egg-white omelette ($8.75). I should have figured that out
from the circumstantial evidence (Ms Lewinsky's waist).

In this impeachment trial, the Senate has been faced with the same
choice as Monica at the Park Hyatt: should they go for the griddle or
make do with the light Continental? Should they cut through the waffle
and fry that fatty slice of ham till he's toast? Or should they just do
as they do in Paris and shrug Gallicly: "Oh-la-la! Zee men, zey heet on
zee saucy can-can girls non-stop. Why make such a meal of eet, hein?"

For weeks, the House impeachment managers have tried to hold Republican
senators up at the All-U-Can-Eat sizzling grill end of the buffet, but
they never really had the stomach for it and last week, confronted with
the succulent haunches of Monica, nearly half the GOP caucus bolted like
a lot of eggs Benedict Arnold and headed for the lite bite section. Like
the President with his intern, this metaphor is apparently unable to
reach "completion". So let me just say that the red meat of the
prosecutors' case has now been drowned in senatorial yogurt.

The London Telegraph, Feb. 8, 1999


Technology

Cisco Systems and Motorola to Develop Wireless Internet System

Will be compatible with Iridium and Teledesic


CHICAGO -- In what is being billed as the next giant step in the
Internet revolution, the Motorola Corp., the maker of wireless
communications products, and Cisco Systems Inc., which provides Internet
equipment, plan to form an alliance that would build the world's largest
wireless Internet system.

The project is the most ambitious effort yet to build a global network
that would enable businesses and consumers to have high-speed Internet
access to e-mail and faxes without the burden of wires, cables or even
walls.

The plan, which is expected to be announced Monday at a cellular
telephone conference in New Orleans, makes Motorola and Cisco Systems
the latest communications and networking giants to join forces in an
attempt to capitalize on the increasing popularity of the Internet and
the rapid growth of wireless communications products.

Over the last year, several telecommunications companies have announced
plans to offer new services or upgrade their wireless communications
operations so that businesses and consumers may have some access to the
Internet. The AT&T Corp., for instance, already is offering wireless
service that taps into electronic mail and Internet information.

The race to transform communications through the Internet also has led
to several giant mergers that could result in greater wireless access.
In June, Northern Telecom Ltd. of Canada, one of the largest makers of
telecommunications gear, said it would acquire Bay Networks Inc., a
large data networking company. Just last month, Lucent Technologies, the
former research arm of AT&T, announced its acquisition of Ascend
Communications, a leading provider of Internet equipment.

Executives at the Microsoft Corp., Apple Computer Inc. and Qualcomm
Inc., the wireless communications outfitter, also have expressed an
interest in developing products related to wireless Internet access.

"This is part of a trend," said Roberta Wiggins, a wireless
communications analyst at the Yankee Group in Boston. "People have been
saying: 'There are all these people with cell phones and all these
people accessing the Internet, and at some point people are going to put
these two things together."'

While Ms. Wiggins and other analysts say that developing a wireless
system could be costly and cumbersome -- with competing and incompatible
systems trying to transmit bulky data and video into wireless units --
officials at Motorola and Cisco say their vision of a world where
automobiles could get tuneups by wireless signals and sales executives
could obtain company information from a remote place is just beyond the
horizon.

"This extends the Internet to a world without wires," said Don Listwin,
executive vice president at Cisco, based in San Jose, Calif.

Over the next four or five years, Motorola and Cisco say they plan to
invest more than $1 billion to create a system capable of transmitting
voice, data and video over existing cellular telephone stations directly
to wireless telephones, laptop computers and other devices.

The system would create a new line of products for Motorola, a new
generation of wireless networking gear for Cisco and perhaps even signal
the convergence of several existing communications products, like
pagers, cellular telephones, televisions, radios and computers. "The
goal is that instead of having four or five communication devices in
your briefcase, you'll have one or two," said Doug Wills, a spokesman
for Cisco.

The two companies also plan to open four jount research and development
centers, two in the United States and two abroad.

A critical piece of the puzzle, Motorola and Cisco say, is that the
wireless transmissions would be delivered using an Internet Protocol
platform that is compatible with all wireless formats. Unlike analog or
digital platforms, the companies say that the Internet Protocol, or IP
platform, will be able to effectively deliver and bundle voice, data and
video feeds through cellular stations.

What is novel about the effort, the companies say, is that they plan to
adopt an "open" standard. In other words, they plan to create a wireless
industry standard that could be adopted by any company that wants to
develop different or competing products. Such an open standard,
officials say, would be different from other wireless Internet efforts
now under development. The new IP framework will be published this
spring in a "white paper," the companies said.

For Motorola, which has stumbled of late in the world of wireless
communications, the deal with Cisco is an attempt to help resurrect its
reputation as an innovative company. After two years of earnings
shortfalls and market share losses tied to its line of wireless
telephones, Motorola has been on an aggressive path to new wireless
ventures.

The company, which is based in Schaumburg, Ill., and had sales of $29
billion in 1998, has a huge stake in Iridium, a satellite venture that
offers voice and paging systems. In May, when sharp cuts were being made
in its work force, Motorola abandoned a plan to spend $13 billion to
build what it called its Internet in the Sky project, a satellite
network capable of delivering high-speed data communications anywhere in
the world.

Instead, Motorola said it would invest about $750 million in Teledesic,
a low-orbit satellite venture that also intends to deliver high-speed
access to the Internet, beginning in 2003. The new wireless venture with
Cisco, officials at Motorola say, is different but would be compatible
with Iridium and Teledesic, which was founded by William H. Gates, the
chairman of Microsoft, and Craig McCaw, the cellular telephone pioneer.

Now, company officials say, they have hit upon a revolutionary scheme.
"With this system you can get Internet information any time, anywhere,"
said Bo Hedfors, senior vice president at Motorola.

As for Cisco, executives say the new venture will strengthen its move
into the telecommunications equipment market, where it is battling
companies like Lucent and Nortel. By forming an alliance with Motorola,
Cisco -- which among other things sells networking gear to telephone
providers -- is staking out firmer ground in its efforts to persuade
global companies to use its equipment and the Internet to transfer
information.

Though some analysts insist that Motorola and Cisco face many hurdles in
creating a wireless Internet system, including the prospect of
transmitting bulky video feeds over a wireless network, the two
companies say the framework they have outlined already has won strong
support from big telephone service providers like Sprint, Nextel and
Airtouch Communications.

The New York Times, Feb. 8, 1999
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to