On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:46:18PM +0200, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote: > So therefore I propose that a new return value for READFUNCTION is > added which instructs libcurl to call fflush() on the FILE*, thereby > forcing the data to the file system. Does anyone have any opinion on > this? Also does this draft patch adhere to the design philosophy of > libcurl? I'm happy to improve my draft patch to a state where it can > be included, so I'd really like you review comments and opinions. :)
I think a much more straightforward approach would be simply to have a CURLOPT that sets unbuffered mode for the FILE object (i.e. calls setbuf() with no buffer given). >>> Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
