Y’all such bunch of babies complaining about shit only your gram pa would bother. This whole mailing list is a deception. Your quarrels are just as old as your biology and is just a shame for your tendons to keep typing these boomerandums. It’s been years of scrolling through these lines and all I can find is propaganda induced paranoia. Iguess y’all fed by the same spoon, right?
> > On Oct 18, 2023, at 11:37 PM, grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In the future, Crypto at the Speed of Light, will pull out > of and bankrupt these stupid companies in less than 24hrs. > Some wannabe UN WEF'r Pol maggot says stupid shit, > same thing... click, poof, gone... no more paycheck for you. > > Turns out, nobody but the Leftist Screechers (hired tools) > wants gay parades, trannies in schools, Antifa, BLM, etc. > > What fun all this U-Turn, Hypocrisy, Blowback, and > Failed ideologies. Keynesians and Pols are next! > > > Victoria's Secret Ditches 'Wokeness'; Wants To Make Sexy Great Again > > Victoria's Secret's shift towards "woke" trends in fashion in recent > years, which included showcasing trans and plus-size models instead of > their traditional sexy models, sparked a wave of discontent among > customers, resulting in a significant revenue drop, crashing stock > price, and Victoria's Secret Fashion Show ratings hitting rock bottom. > > The American lingerie chain spent the last several years > 'Bud-Light-ing' itself with transgender models like Valentina Sampaio > and super woke soccer player Megan Rapinoe while abandoning its iconic > sexy models. > > Trans model Valentina Sampaio > > Soccer player Megan Rapinoe > > What changed in the last two decades? > > One can only guess who might have pushed 'wokeness' on the brand... > > As consumers ditched Victoria's Secret, investors panic-dumped shares > to record low prices. > > ... because sales plunged a stunning $1.8 billion since 2018 (revenue > for its last full fiscal year fell 6.5%, with net income down nearly > half). Consumers went elsewhere - maybe there was a conservative brand > that took market share. > > Earlier this year, CEO Amy Hauk was booted out of the company amid > 'woke' controversies. Now CNN reports the brand has given up on > out-woking others and wants to 'Make "Sexiness" Great Again.' > > Victoria's Secret: The Tour '23, an attempt to revive the runway > show format that launched last month fell somewhere in between the > personification of male lust of the brand's aughts-era heyday and the > inclusive utopia promoted by its many disruptors. > > But in a presentation to investors in New York last week, it was > clear which version of the brand Victoria's Secret executives see as > its future. > > "Sexiness can be inclusive," said Greg Unis, brand president of > Victoria's Secret and Pink, the company's sub-brand targeting younger > consumers. "Sexiness can celebrate the diverse experiences of our > customers and that's what we're focused on." > > Chief executive Martin Waters also disclosed that woke initiatives > were not profitable for the company, stating, "Despite everyone's best > endeavours, it's not been enough to carry the day." > > This comes as the ESG bubble is imploding. And Larry Fink's BlackRock > has ditched the term ESG. > > BlackRock has faced intense criticism from Republican lawmakers who > accuse the firm of violating its fiduciary duty by putting wokeness > ahead of investment returns. > > BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street hold about 15 and 20% of the > outstanding shares of S&P 500 companies and can have enormous direct > power in corporate decision-making. > > Some in corporate America are beginning to realize the challenges ESG > poses for business sustainability. > > However, if these companies want to go woke, and then go broke - so be > it. There is a parallel economy that is exploding.