On 09/16/2014 03:27 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Jonathan Dowland wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:24:07PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: >>> Precisely. Bugs and user difficulties produced by innumerable >>> dependencies have nothing to do with Debian-Users, it's merely an >>> interesting discussion for developers. >> ISTM that such threads - with people who are actually using systemd >> asking for >> help with actual problem using systemd - are easiest spotted because >> Michael >> Beibl or Tollef contribute a useful answer. But such threads seem to >> be less >> than 1 in 10 of the systemd threads on this list, the remainder >> decidedly not >> fitting into the above categorisation. >> > That might better be framed as "1 in 10 POSTS in systemd threads" > > As far as I can tell, most systemd related thread start out with either: > a. a question about systemd impact, or, > b. a report of a problem or impact caused by systemd > c. a question about how to avoid running systemd > > After, maybe a couple of direct responses, each thread then degenerates > into > c. general "discussion" of systemd, it's developers, etc. > > And then degenerates further, into > d. arguments about whether systemd is a legitimate topic on this list.
[...] There is one type to add which creates the largest and most fruitless discussions: Threads starting with e. a link or statement about systemd without much comment which results in much discussion because it is somehow "wrong". In this (worst) case, it would be good to remember http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png Linux-Fan -- http://masysma.lima-city.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ D-community-offtopic mailing list D-community-offtopic@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
