On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <e...@zhevny.com> wrote:
> I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS > already exists and is a central piece of Debian culture, so it seems to > me it would be a good fit. I would prefer if we had an actual package, but a pseudo one will do fine for now. > Martin attempted to start a discussion[1] about a general solution for > all of DebConf to replace rt. But, it didn't progress, yet. If there are > suggestions for a general solution, please respond to that thread. I still don't think that scales, especially for sponsorship. > I propose to wait 1 week for discussion. If there is consensus that this > is a good idea I'll take the action item to request the psuedo-package > from the BTS admins, pointing to this thread as rationale and evidence > of team support. If there is no response or significant disagreement, I > suggest it be added to the 2015-02-02 meeting agenda. With my infra team lead hat on, I would say we don't even need to wait a full week. As you say, this should not be very controversial and I would want to move sooner rather than later. Thanks for picking this up again, Richard _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team