On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:28:37PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Thanks!
> 
> Richard
> 
> Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.

So it is now a bug against bugs.debian.org with a request for more info.
See Don's response below. I'll follow up in #776982. I think I can
provide the requested info. But, of course, suggestions from the team
will help. 

1) pseudo-package name: summit.debconf.org

2) description: Issues regarding the summit.debconf.org software and
service

3) maintainer address: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org ?

  I would not be comfortable with this being just me or any other single
  person.

Bug examples: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Summit#TODO and #DONE
              TODOs in summit.git (and maybe my local TODO)

  Those are probably enough, but I can also dig up some relevant
  mailinglist threads from this year and last.

-edrz


>From debb...@buxtehude.debian.org Tue Feb  3 14:27:52 2015
Subject: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
Reply-To: ow...@bugs.debian.org, 776...@bugs.debian.org
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:23:17 -0800
From: Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org>
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org

Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Control: submitter -1 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <e...@zhevny.com>
Control: retitle -1 add summit.debconf.org psuedo-package

On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> The DebConf Infrastructure team requests a new pseudo-package,
> summit.debconf.org, for use in tracking bugs, feature requests and so
> forth for DebConf's instance of the Summit conference management
> system.

In order to create the psuedopackage, I need the

1) name of the psuedopackage

Presumably, that's "summit.debconf.org" in this case.

2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for
(suitable for inclusion in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages)

3) The e-mail address of the maintainer of the psuedopackage who will
receive mail related to that mailing list

I also like to see an example existing bugs (or e-mails which would have
been/will be turned into bugs) which will be reassigned to this
pseudopackage once it is created. This is primarily so that I know that
the pseudopackage will be used.

Finally, I must note that the name of the psuedopackage will never be
available for a Debian package in the archive. [Given the name chosen,
that seems fine.]

-- 
Don Armstrong                      http://www.donarmstrong.com

What I can't stand is the feeling that my brain is leaving me for 
someone more interesting.
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team

Reply via email to