Hi there, In today's meeting I was asked to provide a summary of the stuff we received at feedb...@debconf.org. A lot of happy attendees did say thank you for a great conference, so ingest that first!
And some sponsors already provided their feedback, which was generally of the "we were happy, thanks, maybe this and that could be improved" nature. Good job! There is also a whole lot more feedback linked to from https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16/FinalReport#Attendee_impressions I'll keep this short, this is what we received at feedback@ in condensed form, and anonymised of course, but including number of people saying this (which was mostly 1): - signage could have been improved around campus (GPS coords published too?) [1 person] - accessibility was not sufficiently handled. [2p] - schedule should be published in advance. [1p] - the talk details template should include room and time information. Attendee said: "I collected some links of talks I want to attend before debconf. When I opened the links again, I did not had the time and room information on theses links." [1p] - food quality wasn't great [1p] - attendees need (an easier) way to opt out of things if they don't get bursary [madduck: seems like a UI/UX topic] [1p] - official comms were great, but -discuss mailing list was not obvious. - group photo is missing!! ;) That's it. Good night, -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf17 Montreal, CA: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf17 DebConf18 in your city? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf18
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team