On Monday 25 May 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Frans Pop <elen...@planet.nl> [2009-05-25 22:30]: > > Do they accept different priority for the same udeb for different > > arches? > > The udeb name contains the name of the subarch, so it would be unique.
Right. I still don't like it much. > > IMO the better solution is to load it using anna-install, either > > during hw-detect or early in partman, based on a (sub)architecture > > test. hw-detect is probably the most logical choice. > > Hmm, that seems overengineered too. I disagree. The function of hw-detect, and in this case more particular disk-detect, is to ensure any hardware needed for partitioning gets made available. IMO this fits that definition perfectly. > How about I simply include the udeb in the netboot initrd for that > particular subarch? Against that is that it's not needed at that stage, so it's initrd bloat. And that _is_ an issue on arm. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
