On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 17:21, Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote:
> Otavio,
>
> am Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 04:55:12PM -0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 23:14, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> 
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 13:26, Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote:
>> > ...
>> >> So my proposal is to switch the udeb compression default in dpkg to xz
>> >> for wheezy, when the busybox and udpkg changes have landed.  Then most
>> >> udebs will get a translation upload anyway, if not they can be binNMUed
>> >> to pick up the right compression.
>> > ...
>> > From my side you have a "go ahead" but I'd like to hear from Colin and
>> > Joey if they can think about any con about doing it.
>> What is the current status of it?
>
> blocked on inconclusive feedback of the dpkg devs on using the extreme variant
> of xz (see #647915).  We could start with -z0 of course, which would be
> supported by dpkg-dev and hence a trivial patch of debhelper would do.
> But it doesn't gain that much.

Dpkg people, can you comment on that? I've pinged people on IRC
already about this bug earlier today.

> In other news I didn't yet upload the udpkg change because I waited for a
> busybox upload to incorporate the already committed unxz inclusion.

This has already been done. Please go ahead with udpkg then :-)


-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkr2m9qyvrapbsvsnzsl3zcz3wl0vw68_pscpjayqq8...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to