Hi Paul, On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:56:08 +1000 paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> Sorry but I disagree that the bug should be closed: all that changed > is that it is now "documented" in README.Debian to do things wrong. Call it as you want, of course. You can read the upstream bug where this was forwarded: http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/redmine/issues/9 > Why not use the trivial patch proposed, instead? > (I do wonder about Message 36 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=295435#36 > and what examples there might be of such broken MUAs...) Probably because it doesn't bring full support for the mboxcl2 format, only a hack to deal with unescaped Froms where there should be none. But that's a wild guess, you should ask upstream. > Admittedly, bug #296190 has been fixed, so this is less important. > And we do not use sylpheed anymore, thunderbird is so much better. Glad to know you still use Debian after so many years :) best regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Q: How much does it cost to ride the Unibus? A: 2 bits.»
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
