Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi.dog...@ens.fr> writes:

> [ Dropped CC to -release and replaced it by 667...@bugs.debian.org ]
>
> On 16/04/12 11:26, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As part of the octave transition, the following hints should be
>> added to allow testing migration of a bunch of Octave-related
>> packages:
>>
>> easy octave-communications/1.1.0-2  octave-control/2.3.50-1
>> octave-data-smoothing/1.3.0-2 octave-econometrics/1:1.0.8-6
>> octave-financial/0.3.2-3 octave-ga/0.9.8-3
>> octave-miscellaneous/1.1.0-1 octave-optim/1.0.17-2
>> octave-signal/1.1.2-1 octave-statistics/1.1.0-1
>> octave-struct/1.0.9-2 octave-time/1.0.9-4 octave-vrml/1.0.11-2
>
>> easy octave-ocs/0.1.3-1 octave-odepkg/0.8.0-1
>>
>
> octave-ocs and octave-odepkg need to migrate at the same time as the
> other packages. So they should be part of the big easy hint.

I don't think so, they are not in the same dependency loop. But having
everything in the same hint doesn't hurt anyways.

> I've added the easy hint and will be processed shortly. (So we will see
> if it did work) but I still see "red" packages on the transition tracker
> [1]. So the transition is now completely finished yet (as I understand
> it). Am I wrong? Is anyone working on getting those "red" packages fixed?

We are going to request the removal of octave-parallel and semidef-oct.

The other packages are not maintained by the Debian Octave Group, so we
cannot act directly. We have filed bugs against libgdf (#666894) and
pfstools (#666959). A bug still needs to be filed against libsml, we’ll
do it shortly.

Best,

-- 
Sébastien Villemot
Researcher in Economics & Debian Maintainer
http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
Phone: +33-1-40-77-84-04 - GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594

Attachment: pgpKW85G6G3n2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to