On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:34:13AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > I don't think it's such a severe issue. > > First, as you stated, it isn't technically an FTBFS; it does not > keep you from building binary packages from the sources we provide. > It just keeps you from creating *our* sources from the ones that > upstream provides. But TTBOMK it is nowhere required that cleaning > up upstream sources must be possible without quirks or even with > Debian main only. > > Second, it is trivial to fix this issue by creating a symlink at the > right place in debian/fix-upstream.sh.
Sure. I think we need to replace deutex, really. There's a small risk that one day, Freedoom's palette might differ from Doom's, in which case we'll introduce subtle differences/problems by relying on it. But Doom's palette is not copyrightable; once derived from the commercial data such a table could be freely distributed. And a deutex-like tool that had such a table in it and didn't depend on the IWAD for manipulating PWADs would be great. (+one with PNG support/default to PNG and various other quirks and DOSisms removed :)) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org