Package: buildd.debian.org Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708055 for a recent example.
diff -u 1/changelog.Debian 2/changelog.Debian --- 1/changelog.Debian 2013-05-12 12:40:00.000000000 +0300 +++ 2/changelog.Debian 2013-05-12 12:36:00.000000000 +0300 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ mesa (8.0.5-4+b1) sid; urgency=low - * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for amd64; no source changes. + * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes. * Rebuild against libffi6 - -- amd64 Builddd Daemon (barber) <buildd_amd64-bar...@buildd.debian.org> Sun, 12 May 2013 09:40:10 +0000 + -- i386 Build Daemon (murphy) <buildd_i386-mur...@buildd.debian.org> Sun, 12 May 2013 09:36:04 +0000 Since wheezy is out a solution should be implemented for this IMHO, otherwise it'll just make all upcoming transitions break packages on a binNMU. Please drop the architecture and buildd names from binNMU uploads: the buildd could sign the .deb packages to let people find out which builder processed a binNMU. Or you could put the binNMU into a separate file as suggested here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2012/07/msg00024.html --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.9.1 Debian Release: jessie/sid 500 unstable ftp.ro.debian.org 500 stable security.debian.org 500 stable ftp.ro.debian.org 1 experimental ftp.ro.debian.org --- Package information. --- Package's Depends field is empty. Package's Recommends field is empty. Package's Suggests field is empty. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
