On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:36:39AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > This sounds almost exactly like what dh-make already does, with a few > incremental enhancements. Why should we have this in the archive as a > separate package, instead of improving the existing tool? Dividing efforts > between two packages seems like a sure recipe for both tools falling behind > in the long term. I wondered that myself actually.
- Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
