Hi, Julian Gilbey wrote: > I think enough people are likely to be stung by this one that > providing a transition apache2.2-common package would be worth > doing,
I agree. > with an appropriate warning in the Description field. This should be not necessary as the transitional package likely can be be built in a way that it doesn't own the files any more (and maybe a modified postrm script) and hence doesn't remove them on purge, either. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org