On 24 Jun 2014 16:51, "Raphael Hertzog" <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > It doesn't look clean to have python-django recommends python3-django just > to have django-admin and django_bash_completion. I believe it would better > to move them to a "python-django-common" package, no?
I can't see how that would help. You would still need to depend on python3-django. Alternatives would work for django-admin but probably overkill. Hmm. Might be possible to replace django-admin (it is small) and make it use python3-django with Python3 if installed else python-django with Python2 somehow? > And we could/should move to that common package all the non *.py files > like *.po, *.mo, *.html, *.css, *.gif, *.png, *.json, *.js, etc. > > Django is relatively large, I don't like duplicating files when it's not > really needed. Yes. Moving files around makes me nervous however probably a good idea. > In any case, feel free to commit your work to subversion, we can always > improve furter before upload. Will do so. Might have to wait until tomorrow now. > Why is that needed? Most tools create the required directories on the fly. I got a error at one stage. Confusing. Probably should remove it and see if I still get this error. Thanks for your feedback.