On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:58AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> writes: > > > From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including > > libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2 would not > > depend on redhat-cluster and it could be removed from testing? > > Yes, that's the plan. > > > As a more immediate fix - can the HA team comment on whether libccs-perl > > has any value? > > Being built from the redhat-cluster source package, it will go when we > remove redhat-cluster from the archive. Has it got any rdeps?
No rdeps and popcon of 3. > > If not then perhaps that should just be dropped from the > > redhat-cluster package ASAP [...] -- of course, since redhat-cluster > > FTBFS, this would have to be done by the release team manually > > removing (just) libccs-perl from testing. Is this feasible? > > I don't know if it's possible, but if yes: no objection from the HA > team. Great, thanks. Let's wait to hear what the RT think then. Cheers, Dominic.