also sprach Robert Edmonds <edmo...@debian.org> [2016-03-01 20:14 +0100]: > I like the first suggestion even more: > > Watch rtnetlink and react properly to network configuration changes > as they happen. This is usually the nicest solution, but not always > the easiest. > > But that is significantly more development work.
Would this enable me to say that unbound should just listen on iface "eth0"? > By the way, have you tried "ip-transparent: yes"? According to No! > I wonder if IP_FREEBIND would actually be a better fit for the > functionality described in unbound.conf than IP_TRANSPARENT, since > unbound.conf doesn't mention any of the proxying properties of > IP_TRANSPARENT. I agree. Meanwhile, I found that adding dad-attempts 200 (standard ifupdown feature) to the iface inet6 stanza in /etc/network/interface would make ifup wait up to 20 seconds for the DAD to complete… and block meanwhile. This is enough for my interface to come up with a non-tentative address and so by the time boot resumes, the address is fully configured. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)