On 07-Apr-2016, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Ben Finney (2016-04-07 21:38:04)
> > By the section descriptions, this package belongs in section “web”.
> > 
> > Please set the field “Section” appropriately on this package.
> 
> You are so very right. This is a kind of bug I get annoyed by
> myself, and am embarrassed to have failed with some of "my"
> packages.
> 
> Thanks a lot for reporting! And in you usual elaborate style.

You're welcome, it's good to have minor bug reports appreciated :-)

> > Since the package is already in Debian with a different section,
> > you will also need to submit a request to override the existing
> > section
> > <URL:https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#override-file>.
> 
> Oh, I didn't know that detail. Thanks for educating me!

That is IMO a flaw in the archive system; I don't know the reasons why
Section values don't automatically propagate, and haven't spent time
to investigate. In the meantime, we are stuck with requesting that
manual override.

-- 
 \     “I must say that I find television very educational. The minute |
  `\       somebody turns it on, I go to the library and read a book.” |
_o__)                                                    —Groucho Marx |
Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to