On 07/15/2016 01:11 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: libcap-ng
> Version: 0.7.7-3
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> 
> Hi,
> 
> libcap-ng is part of the build-closure of essential and thus needs to be
> able to be cross built. On the other hand, cross building python
> extensions is currenty non-trivial as the python policy is not yet fully
> fleshed out wrt cross building. So to make cross building libcap-ng work
> today, I am proposing to make those python extensions optional via a
> nopython build profile. Refer to
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-cross/2016/04/msg00004.html for a
> rationale on the profile name.
> 
> I am attaching a patch that adds the requested support and I hope that
> it is not a big maintenance cost. After applying it, libcap-ng cross
> builds just fine under the nopython profile. Please consider applying
> it.
> 

Hi Helmut,


I have applied your patch and build the package successfully. However, I
got a lot of lintian errors related to the profile:

Now running lintian...
E: libcap-ng source: invalid-profile-name-in-build-profiles-field
nopython python-cap-ng
E: libcap-ng source: invalid-profile-name-in-build-profiles-field
nopython python3-cap-ng
W: libcap-ng source:
restriction-formula-without-versioned-dpkg-dev-dependency
W: libcap-ng source:
restriction-formula-with-debhelper-without-debhelper-version
E: libcap-ng source: invalid-profile-name-in-source-relation nopython
[build-depends: dh-python <!nopython>]
E: libcap-ng source: invalid-profile-name-in-source-relation nopython
[build-depends: swig <!nopython>]
E: libcap-ng source: invalid-profile-name-in-source-relation nopython
[build-depends: python-all-dev <!nopython>]
E: libcap-ng source: invalid-profile-name-in-source-relation nopython
[build-depends: python3-dev <!nopython>]
W: libcap-ng source:
restriction-formula-without-versioned-dpkg-dev-dependency
W: libcap-ng source:
restriction-formula-with-debhelper-without-debhelper-version

I am running an up to date sid, but it seems the nopython profile is
missing. Is that expected ?

Thanks,
Pierre

Reply via email to