Hi Christian,
Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org> [in 2014]:
> > Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:54:02PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> [..]
> > > So to my understanding, you would like the rxvt-unicode source package
> > > to provide a transitional aterm binary package which depends on
> > > rxvt-unicode and provides the appropriate symlink?
> >
> > Yes, that's my suggestion for a smooth transition in case, aterm gets
> > removed.
> >
> > > I don't have any objections to this. If it's the path you decide to
> > > take, let me know and I'll take care of it.
> >
> > Thanks for the offer. Will let you know.
>
> Is this still your plan?
Yes, it's still my "plan" to let the rxvt-unicode package maintainer
know about the outcome of the decision about what to do with aterm. I
though wouldn't call that a "plan".
But my suggestion of course still exists. But it's nothing more than a
suggestion. I don't feel to be in the position to _decide_ about
aterm's fate in Debian. But I also won't object if others make a
decision.
Oh, and I agree with Adam that we should prefer rxvt-unicode-256color
over rxvt-unicode in this regards.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
