-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 14:42 -0500, Breno Leitao wrote: > Currently bpfcc does not build on ppc64el (and aaarch64) due to missing > luajit package. > > The luajit upstream situation for the new architecture is not clear > , so, Debian have a luajit package in the experimental archive that > contains the ppc64el patch (still not accepted upstream). > > I am planning on how to enable it for ppc64el, Can we depend on > experimental package for ppc64el? If not, can we depend on lua instead > of luajit?
The package's test binary is failing to build on ppc64el, on top of your mentioned patch for luajit. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bpfcc&arch=ppc64el&ver=0.2.0-3&st amp=1486558047&raw=0 The build failure looks more like a luajit problem. - -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEQCVDstmIVAB/Yn02pjpYo/LhdWkFAlifV8cACgkQpjpYo/Lh dWmG9xAAjltDvoC5hi9+uKD6msbGS41ouX24kF7SmZ3WR6rWKOv2EsgZGvhNoGlt MPlMy8m4ADnjZIvnBq9teQGFkYLOxWcffGMvnzdfEaxaTnbqw/FsBOt+mXd2vpUL B9d1hI6vUzRutIl11mT69QsISco+FrBvj5JVqlaRDq5RZd10aTyXvWCXAmcqCcLV BnPulk9yv2LTBtQDgcQMSEpScFFaalQRCSoWVFIin9+Xl1LzNB++MBoYJ3sfA1Km FMXvLbsKITWjouZtxF8wT0bt22bsZJL3HUqIX31xvm98SVbwKM4bAyX3Xmfsztkh UQaMolexu2EH27BQ4baBwnOZtW1sQMaD7BUbBEat5yPDQiSfUpCJt7u3orBdVPEO BuYAItEWvOOYYgw73gZ2XLE9jiFHwkr302zfdPPq+VOktdGKvys67VJuofiQQw/4 4aoaWtCGXylfxTUDgJ8sQD08EWMz2hKFPYaycC1XwlCFDsbeSkV4UawKruyzxHGu qZleDeJCwrUeeYC8pLLEQukerFgZGYelovCalC5EvkuWgyYzQPLHEpzpFBD1TBGk i8bPAbngllVIGyACtrqZaByKv1AwoIFjFKn6ZO0Yjf8EwmdBd1KoJT/8aWh5vjxP jaGBdJKrH4cWLrnvIFG0KRtlLYFHk9yfTdbjxPeriRFVzh8qPz4= =QT8Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
