On 14 April 2017 at 13:47, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> * Reuben Thomas: > > > A workaround is to build bash with --without-bash-malloc (but I presume > > there's a good reason not to do that?). > > FWIW, Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux compile bash this way, so it > can't be *that* bad. > I hadn't appreciated that. It would seem to be a good way to fix this problem and also avoid any bugs in bash's malloc; presumably the performance hit is of relatively little interest given that bash is no longer the default /bin/sh. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
