El mar., 24 de abr. de 2018 02:47, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> escribió:
> Scott Kitterman: > > > > > > On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" > <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built > >> with a patched compat 12, then all applications rebuilt against 5.10.2 > >> would require at very least 5.10.2 even if symbols files allowed it to > >> depend on a minor version. > >> > > As far as I understand it, symbols files overrule shlibs. I.e. if your > symbols files covers all the symbols required by the application, the > version will be derived from the symbols file. > > dpkg-shlibdeps(1) seems to agree with this: [snip] Interesting. That sounds pretty good then. I'll check the next time I rebuild qt. > If that's true, I doubt C++ symbols files are worth the trouble. > > > > Scott K > > > > I think this case would still work as it used too (e.g. ok for .debs and > ignored for .udebs - but as I recall, qtbase-abi does not have any udebs > and should not be concerned by that) > If everything works as we understand it now then yes, it should just simply work. >
