]] Philip Hands > Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> writes: > > > This should be implemented in Debian Policy by declaring that a a > ^^^ > You've this doubled 'a' on two occasions in this text.
I'll fix that, thanks for spotting it. > Presumaly we would not want to see new packages adopting the use of > vendor-specific patch series prior to Buster. > > Do we need to make the "SHOULD NOT" conditional on the package already > having a vendor-specific patch series at the time of this resolution? I think that just adds needless complexity and assumes that maintainers will want to add bugs to their package. I really hope that's not the case, so I don't think it's worthwhile to add extra language for it. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
