Package: ftp.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #935057
Hi, I just noticed removal of 'afl' from testing, because it was removed from unstable, but I find this removal a bit quick in jumping to conclussions that afl is unmaintained. There was a release just few days ago, and the project is hosted in more open manner than before on github (previously it was maintained by one person, and without any real source control system accessible to public, which also did affect me, as I did send patches to original author, and they were never responded to or merged): https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/afl-users/ODNQwYqZGC0 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/afl-users/WX8NdcB9GmM GitHub shows plenty of pull requests and merged code in recent days: https://github.com/google/AFL/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr Version 2.53b correctly build with clang / llvm 8.0. In fact it also does build with clang 9 too. And even before that there were patches to do so with 2.52b ( https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/afl-patches ). 2.52c released month ago, also does support llvm / clang++ from 3.8 to up to including 8. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/afl-users/jHPw2LvbE0A It is more a question to maintainer of afl package. I wish the package was back in Debian, as I did find it pretty useful for my work, and less manually compiled packages the better. :) Thank you, Witold
