On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:12:14 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > That version is higher than the package in unstable, which is wrong.
Now newest uim package is in unstable. > Moreover, the package obviously landed in NEW. I have asked ftp-master > to reject it, partly due to the broken version number, but also please > *do not* upload packages to {,old}stable that will involve NEW without > an explicit ACK from the Release Team. Sorry for my procedure. Could you review the package again?