On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:54:05AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> the new pre-up.d/down.d scheme is a bit strange. First of all there are
> two files from wpasupplicant in each of these directories: a line
> 0_wpasupplicant and a script wpasupplicant. Shouldn't one be enough?
> Second, on startup I get the following error for ifup lo:
> run-parts: /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/0_wpasupplicant exited with return
> code 1
> and on shutdown
> run-parts: /etc/network/if-down.d/0_wpasupplicant exited with return
> code 1
> run-parts: /etc/network/if-post-down.d/0_wpasupplicant exited with
> return code 1
>
> wpasupplicant shouldn't attempt to start the supplicant for lo and quit
> immediately without notice.
Thank you very much, you are completely right. We will fix both issues
in our next upload!
If you spot other issues, please tell us, we are considering to upload this
integration to unstable soon.
Gruesse,
Reinhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
