Ansgar <ans...@43-1.org> writes: > Russ Allbery writes: >> Ansgar <ans...@43-1.org> writes:
>> I think we can proceed to add a Policy "should" for including a systemd >> unit file unless someone raises objections pretty soon here. So far, I >> haven't seen any objections to the basic idea. > Okay. Anything further I should do except wait? I'll take a look at the wording hopefully this weekend. >> We're doing some of that already even by introducing a "should," and >> there's some argument to be made for starting with a Lintian warning >> instead, but I'm not inclined to be that conservative here, mostly >> because we're long-overdue for saying something, and I think the should >> is fairly mild in this case. > I think there is already a lintian warning: > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/missing-systemd-service-for-init.d-script.html Oh! I should have checked rather than assuming. It would ideally be nice to make it a warning rather than a pedantic tag before we add it to Policy, but meh, and the count of tags isn't all that high. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>