On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 09:28:29PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'm aware that you both called them trivialities and quoted
> "breakages", but is it worth documenting any of them somewhere in the
> package?

I could probably add a NEWS item for the ACMEv2 default move, as that's
probably something interesting to many.

The --acept-terms thing is something that affects only new accounts, so
it's not useful to show it on upgrades (not to mention that it already
doesn't work since November…), and the other DNS thing is something that
I don't consider worth warning about.  What do you say?


In the meantime I tried on a stretch system with the stretch version
getting a cert from that (I had to re-use an account from another
installation since I couldn't register a new account with ACMEv1), and
then update to the proposed version and renew.  I only tested http-01
tbh, but dns-01 has no reasons to fail if http works… (if it does it
really should only be for how the local hooks does things).

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to