Andreas Henriksson <andr...@fatal.se> writes: > I'd like to ask if there are anything that requires attention before > https://bugs.debian.org/738548 can move forward? Help is available if > actionable problems are described. > > I'd like to remind you that policy now explicitly states that providing > native systemd units is recommended and we have a GR stating that > declarative solutions are preferred. I don't think we can get much > further into a decision-has-been-made territory. > > Seeing that this bug was opened over half a decade ago with patch > provided makes me quite sad about how broken the Debian development > model is and how pointless it apparently is to try to contribute > improvements.
I have no objection to this other then technical issues. Plus the lack of time on my behalf. I tried making this change, and found it appears to be incomplete, lintian complains with the following errors: E: amavisd-new: omitted-systemd-service-for-init.d-script amavis-mc E: amavisd-new: omitted-systemd-service-for-init.d-script amavisd-snmp-subagent Maybe we need some sort of disabled by default systemd file for these services too? -- Brian May <b...@debian.org>
