Hi, On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:25:27PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Guido Günther: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 12:15:34PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > >> control: affects -1 libvirtd-daemon-system > >> > >> Hi, > >> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:42:55AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > >>> Package: debhelper > >>> Version: 12.10 > >>> Severity: normal > >>> > >>> ``` > >>> [...] > >>> ``` > >>> > >>> But it generates > >>> > >>> ``` > >>> [...] > >>> ``` > >>> > >>> although it should only do so for libvirtd.service itself. > >> > >> I tried to exclude these using '-X' but that did not work either. They > >> seem to mostly match what libvird has listed in Wants/Requires: > >> > >> Requires=virtlogd.socket > >> Requires=virtlockd.socket > >> # Use Wants instead of Requires so that users > >> # can disable these three .socket units to revert > >> # to a traditional non-activation deployment setup > >> Wants=libvirtd.socket > >> Wants=libvirtd-ro.socket > >> Wants=libvirtd-admin.socket > >> > >> but libvirtd-admin.socket is missing. The reason i came across this is > >> #955483 where i'd like to avoid that the socket units are restarted at > >> all. > > > > It's not Wants/Require but the ones listed in 'Also=' - this is > > preblemati since the ordering is wrong (see 955483) > > Cheers > > -- Guido > > > > Hi, > > Is this considerably different from #841095?
No, i merged these already. -- Guido
