On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:13:02PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi, > > I don't understand why you report a bug on 1.5.0.87+dfsg1-1 on the 20th > of may when testing has 1.5.0.87+dfsg1-4 since the 9th of march, and > unstable had it since the 4th of march.
The version should indicate the earliest known-broken version. > Isn't the problem history already? 1.5.0.87+dfsg1-4+b1 built only at the second attempt, the bug is still in unstable. armhf build failures are also frequent in the reproducible CI: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/giac.html > JP cu Adrian