Hi, On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 10:48:13PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > > The package at > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 > > > > builds but is also not finished yet. I do not remember what had stopped > > me from finalising and uploading. Please checkout and moreover if you > > talk next time about "ete packaging repositor" provide a link. :-) > > Thanks for your information. I have not noticed the existing RFP and > have issued an ITP > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963732. > Should I close the ITP I issued ? I wonder how to turn the RFP into ITP.
I do not really mind. May be merging both bugs is the technical correct way to go. > I have created a personal repository at > https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/ and the ci passes > https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/-/pipelines/152628. > The package has been uploaded to https://mentors.debian.net/package/ete. As I said I do not require sponsees to upload to mentors. The rationale is that I sometimes want to change things quickly and directly - thus I always sponsor from salsa repository. > I am intending to merge these works into > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3. Yes, please do so. > Some technical aspect of merging these two repos: > I have found that med-team/python-ete3 repo uses some patches to deal > with the offline testing problems. I think there is a more elegant way > to handle this obstacle. As I tried to express: Feel free to take over your solution. There is no point in sticking to not so good solutions just because they were invented once. > To summarize the way: using pytest instead of unittest. > For more detail, see > https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/06/msg00035.html. > So I am planning to override med-team/python-ete3 testing rule by > using the one of zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/. Yep. Please go for it! :-) > For other parts, I think it is not difficult to merge. Sounds good. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de