Hi Shlomi,
Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > I'm surprised that this was only 2.5 years ago. It feels as if that
> > struggle with the switch to cmake was like half a decade ago. :-)
>
> Just for the record, *my* first commits referencing cmake were (according to
> git log --stat):
>
> commit c69856d5089498bf65d55fbf699928d1a268bbda
> Author: shlomif <shlomif@7081e830-ea04-0410-ae62-fb6148e2d9db>
> Date: Sat Jan 19 08:14:59 2008 +0000
You've got a point there. Checked my git history. I maintained wml
above 2.0.x for quite a while (starting in 2012 with 2.2.0) only in
Debian Experimental. A branch named cmake is mentioned in merge
commits at least since mid 2013. And yeah, now I remember again: It
took at least two Debian releases until I was confident enough to
merge the cmake-based WML back into master and Debian Unstable... So
my gut feeling that this fight with cmake was half a decade ago is not
that wrong. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
